Before
I heard Oedipus’ story, I heard of his sin. I learned about the tragic
character that killed his father and slept with his mother. I wrinkled my nose
in disgust at such a man. I scoffed that such a creature prowled within the
realms of our imagination and exhaled a sigh of relief to hear he existed only
upon the stage of a Sophocles’ mind. Now that I have read Oedipus’ story, I
pity him. I pity this man lost in the tangles of a tragedy. However, though I
pity the self-blinded man, I sighed at what he considered his fate. Indeed,
fate nor the gods condemned poor Oedipus. Oedipus committed hamartia, when he
did not take the necessary precautions to change his “fate.”
According
to the article by Aristotle and subsequent definitions, “hamartia” is to “miss
the mark” in archery (Butcher). I argue that Oedipus did “miss the mark.”
Oedipus first “misses the mark,” when he unknowingly curses himself. Upon
learning that the gods order the death of Laius’ murder, Oedipus declares that
he himself will seek out the murder and then, curses the murder’s life.
Ironically Oedipus says, I shall fight for him in this matter, as if for my own
father, and I shall try everything, seeking to find the one who committed the
murder” (19). Thus, Oedipus fulfills his words and seeks after the murder, as
if for his father. Yet, he finds that he is the murderer. He killed his own
father. Creon wisely says in the beginning of the play, “What is sought can be
captured, but what is ignored escapes” (15). Oedipus “missed the mark” when he
continued to pursue the murderer, when he ignored his wife and mother’s
entreats to leave the matter, and when he realizes his own ugly crimes.
But
in all tragedies, sin can never hide, as it can never be ignored. Thus,
Oedipus’ true “hamartia” came earlier. Oedipus reveals that he knew of a personal
prophecy concerning himself. Phoebus once told him that he would sleep with his
mother and kill his father (38). In an attempt to escape the prophecy, Oedipus
ran. He says, “I heard and fled, henceforth to share with Corinth only the
stars, where I would never see completed the disgrace of those evil oracles of
mine” (38). Thus, Oedipus’ great “hamartia” is that he believed running was
sufficient to escape the prophecy. To truly run away from such a prophecy, more
precaution is necessary. Oedipus should have never killed any man, just to
prevent any prophecy of murder. If no murder is done, then Oedipus would have
never killed his father. Furthermore, Oedipus should have never slept with a
woman, who was clearly older than him. At times, we humans believe we can
escape our fates by merely running.
Thus,
because of his great hamartia, Oedipus learned the truth. In the agony of his
pitiful tragedy, he witnesses the suicide of his mother and wife. He gouges out
his eyes and holds his cries tearless tears upon his children and siblings’
shoulders. Truly, Oedipus is to be pitied. He was a common man. He was a good
man. If only, he had taken more precautions. If only he had done more than run.
Theses are some really sound arguments for Oedipus' hamartia. Also great organization and formatting I know I need practice writing in MLA style.
ReplyDeleteInteresting thought that Oedipus' hamartia was cursing himself. Also, those were good points about him preventing the fulfillment of the prophecy by never killing anyone or never sleeping with a woman older than him; however, it is really easy for us humans to forget even important things like that prophecy as we go about our lives. It's sad that Oedipus did.
ReplyDeleteYou make some valid points and I liked how you said he should never have killed anyone just to make sure the prophecy never happened. This might not have gone over so well in a society that is obsessed with power and war though. In the end, I also see that Oedipus has cursed himself with his own actions and by trying to run away.
ReplyDelete